The Strange Case of
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde provides a unique and original story that is
centered on the character of Mr. Hyde. His character is an extremely violent
but secluded individual. In the end of the book Dr. Jekyll describes himself as
having more than the fathers interest, while Mr. Hyde had more of the “son’s
indifference” (40, Stevenson). This to me displays not only the differences
between the two characters and the role they play in the development of the
two, but also the differentiating moral standards. The two chiropractors can be
seen as two extremes of human natures way of looking at morals. Stevenson see’s
the human moral code as two separate kinds, there is the evil and there is the
good. This can also be seen as the moral code that we choose to show to the
public and the one that we all have within ourselves. We are in a constant
battle of fighting our, “inner Hyde”.
The way in which I saw Dr.Jekyl develop was through tow
moral codes. One of which was the perception that Dr.Jekyl was a character that
had a strong moral code that mostly resembles Utilitarianism. The reason for
this assumption was that he was trying to protect Mr.Hyde from the law because
he knew something about him that made him redeeming. Dr. Jekyl would often
times make excuses for Mr.Hyde and eventually says that he would not do
anything else to anyone. If that were true then he would be looking out for the
well being of Mr.Hyde, while also having the assumption that he would prevent
anything else from happening to the people of London. However, the violence
continues through Mr.Hyde’s character. This is then the point in the story that
I started to question the moral code of Dr.Jekyll, especially in his
disappearance at the end of the story.
Once reaching the conclusion of the story where we finally
find out that Dr.Jekyl and Mr.Hyde are in fact the same person, my perception
of their moral code changes in a way that is more self-indulging. You realize
that his protection of the character was just a protection of his secret. For this
reason his moral code moves more towards an ethical egoist moral code. Even
though Dr.Jekyl was fully aware of what he had become and that he was being
taken over by the darker side of his own psyche. He was more worried about the
condition of his own life then the fact that he had become a danger to the
people around him. Even the will which he had written out that gave all of his
assets to Mr.Hyde in the case of his death was self oriented in the way that he
was making sure that he was preserving his wealth even if it meant that his
violent alternate personality was the one that received it.
As the pieces fell into place it became clear as to what Dr.Jekyl’s
moral standards really were. Even though his self can be separated into an evil
and good version of himself, Each character shared the selfishness of their
actions and their lack of consideration of everyone elses safety. For this
reason, his more code was consistent in being ethical egoism.
Here is what appears to be the key to your interpretation of the novel: ". . . his moral code moves more towards an ethical egoist moral code."
ReplyDelete